I used to believe that when you meet someone who feels like a lightning strike, that’s destiny.

The kind of connection where conversation runs without oxygen. Where silence isn’t awkward, it’s electric. Where you look at each other and think: There you are. I’ve been waiting.

People write books about that feeling. They call it love. Fate. Twin flames. Some go further — they describe it as encountering God in human form.

And I get it.

Because when someone resonates on the same spectrum you do — the same edges, the same appetite for intensity, the same refusal to live in beige — it can feel transcendent.

It can feel like being seen without translation.

It can feel like finally taking a full breath.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth I wish I’d understood earlier:

Sometimes what feels like divine alignment is just two dysregulated nervous systems harmonizing.

And harmony does not equal health.

For most of my life, I’ve been trying to understand that kind of connection. It is the spine of my writing. The current underneath everything I’ve ever put on paper.

The fascination with the person who clicks — who mirrors you so precisely it feels mystical.

————————————————————————

I watched The Sinner recently — the season with the two friends who challenge each other past reason, past morality, past sanity. They don’t look like villains. They look like intellectual soulmates. They dare each other toward transcendence.

Until it becomes annihilation.

That storyline unsettled me because I recognized it.

Not the extremity.

The dynamic.

Two people who make each other feel more alive than the rest of the world ever could. Two people who believe the intensity itself is proof of meaning.

When you’re wired for depth, for risk, for big ideas and bigger feelings, meeting someone who amplifies that wiring can feel like obedience to the natural order of things.

It feels right.

It feels earned.

It feels like coming home.

But sometimes it’s not love.

Sometimes it’s shared delusion.

————————————————————————–

My husband and I met as daredevils.

Overachievers. Dreamers. Builders of worlds. We lived like the rules were suggestions and the ceiling didn’t exist. We weren’t reckless in the obvious ways — we were reckless in ambition, in belief, in how far we thought we could stretch reality.

Together, we felt invincible.

Apart from the world.

Which, in hindsight, should have been a clue.

When two people build a private ecosystem that doesn’t answer to gravity, it’s intoxicating. You can convince each other that exhaustion is passion. That risk is vision. That isolation is intimacy.

Until one of you hits the edge.

And when one person begins to stabilize — to say, “Maybe this isn’t sustainable” — the other can experience it as betrayal.

Because the original bond was forged in intensity.

And intensity always wants more.

————————————————————————–

The fallout from that shift can be brutal. Not because love wasn’t real. But because the structure of the connection was built on mutual escalation.

If your intimacy was rooted in how far you could go together, then slowing down feels like abandonment.

Here’s the part that has taken me the longest to untangle:

If my husband and I shared that kind of charged connection — the kind that felt cosmic — then how could he later form a similar bond with someone else?

If what we had was sacred, how could it be replicated?

The question haunted me for a long time (my newest book Down Man was born from the obsession to comprehend this).

It felt like proof that nothing was special.

But what I understand now is this:

The connection wasn’t sacred because of the person.

It was sacred because of the wiring.

————————————————————————–

When two people share similar wounds, similar appetites, similar shadow material — they can access each other quickly. They don’t need to explain the darkness. They can let it breathe.

And letting your dark side breathe can feel like relief.

Like oxygen.

Like truth.

But breathing darkness is not the same thing as healing it.

We romanticize intensity because it’s cinematic. It makes for good novels. It makes for addictive relationships.

It does not necessarily make for safe love.

There is a difference between someone who sees your darkness and someone who steadies it.

There is a difference between someone who says, “Let’s see how far we can push this,” and someone who says, “Let’s not burn down the house.”

The first feels like transcendence.

The second feels like restraint.

But only one builds a life.

————————————————————————–

I wish I could say this realization arrived with fireworks and clarity.

It didn’t.

It arrived with disappointment.

It arrived with the sobering understanding that some of my most electric connections were not proof of spiritual alignment — they were proof of shared instability.

That doesn’t mean those connections were fake.

It means they were combustible.

And combustion always feels holy right before it destroys something.

We all have dark sides.

Parts of us that crave chaos. Parts that want to be uncontained. Parts that feel powerful when mirrored.

When someone gives those parts permission, it feels like freedom.

But love — actual love — sometimes looks like containment.

Not suppression.

Containment.

A steadying hand on your back when you’re about to sprint off a cliff.

And the brutal irony is that the person who steadies you may feel less magical than the one who ignites you.

Stability is quiet.

It does not glow neon.

It builds slowly.

It can even feel boring if your nervous system is addicted to adrenaline.

————————————————————————–

So what do we do with this?

We talk about it.

We stop equating electricity with destiny.

We question why “feels like God” so often coincides with “destroys my life.”

We ask ourselves whether the connection is expanding us — or amplifying our pathology.

And we admit, gently, that we have been both wrong and wounded.

That we have participated in our own delusions.

That sometimes what felt cosmic was simply chemistry layered over unresolved pain.

————————————————————————–

If you have experienced this kind of bond — the kind that felt otherworldly and then catastrophic — you are not stupid.

You are not naive.

You are human.

You found someone who spoke your nervous system’s language fluently.

That fluency can feel like salvation.

It can also be a trap.

The work, I think, is learning to tell the difference.

Learning to value the connection that steadies you over the one that dazzles you.

Learning to see magic for what it is: sometimes a miracle, sometimes a mirror.

And sometimes just two storms recognizing themselves in each other.

Not every storm is meant to be sailed into.

Some are meant to be watched from shore.